Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
24 days ago.
by R1KRA8
Kendall78
#1

LtTE Overreactions

There are many people I respect on here, so it seems very odd to me when they go so off base with critiques on their own writings.

 
 

Member Comments

Tiredofit

That comment says a lot about you.

Posted 103 days ago.

Kendall78

One must also take into consideration to the quality of person that would consdier it to be very suspect information.

Posted 103 days ago.

Tiredofit

No perhaps not, but advocating for more Govt control on VERY SUSPECT INFORMATION does.

Posted 103 days ago.

Kendall78

I doubt that supporting global warming with information makes one a progressive socialist.

Posted 103 days ago.

Tiredofit

You have demonstrated what YOU are Oneil and that is a progressive socialist

Posted 106 days ago.

Tiredofit

It was not I that called it global warming it was the very hacks that*****off the public dole, when it turned out that that there was in fact no warming, you socialisit deemed it climate change much like the global cooling of the 70s

Posted 106 days ago.

Tiredofit

You are such a tool

Posted 106 days ago.

Tiredofit

Oneil we all know what you are, take a break from your socialism and understand likey aint proof

Posted 106 days ago.

Tiredofit

This from a small group of people whos very existence is based on that likelihood. Not much of a reach to say they have a vested interest in likely FUNDING

Posted 106 days ago.

Tiredofit

oh the hateful oneil has weighed in with a LIKELY. That's not proof its LIKELY thank you very much.

Posted 106 days ago.

Tiredofit

Kendall you have chosen to be obtuse, that's fine. I have made it VERY clear why I take issue with Harry, nice of you to try to carry his water however, good on ya.

Posted 106 days ago.

Kendall78

Clearly put, if you disagree with the evidence Harry has put forth in regards to climate change....you go after that.

Just so everyone is clear, do you disagree with the conclusions that Harry has made on climate change and global warming?

Posted 106 days ago.

Kendall78

"I will post what I wish where I wish, got it?"

Most insane and inane people do.

As for his views, it doesn't matter if he doesn't apply science to everything in his life. He has the right to take the tools avaialable to him and arrive with a conclusion.

It is for those that disagree to show how the person is incorrect in their hypothesis and offer up a counter proposal.

If this were a debate platform, Harry would win simply because people seem to be attacking his chosen method to analyse evidence instead of attacking the result.

Posted 106 days ago.

Tiredofit

I actually share his religion or I think I do. I am not denigrating his faith in any way as I too am a Christian. THE POINT is that you cannot be anti science as it applies to creation and THEN call those that are skeptical of climate change anti science deniers, can I make it any clearer?

Posted 106 days ago.

Tiredofit

You of course miss the point again. Its not his stance on Climate or Religion, its the fact that he choses to call those that don't agree on one as Anti Science and on the other side, well its ok. Get a clue pal.

Posted 106 days ago.

Tiredofit

Kendall I could not possibly care less what you think as it applies to my credibility, I will post what I wish where I wish, got it?

Posted 106 days ago.

Kendall78

"you are a hypocrite and a fraud."

Your opinion means next to nothing in this regard. But what I am trying to do is to keep with the current topic which seems to be global warming/climate change.

Now if you disagree with the science cited in someone's argument...what do you have?

If your whole counter to global warming is that Harry doesn't seem to apply science in ways you think he should...then you are currently on the losing side of the argument.

And I might point out that requiring a person to a standard based on science when it would appear you ignore the science of global warming could make you a hypocrite.

Posted 106 days ago.

Kendall78

"It does when the phrase ANTI SCIENCE is used twice in the title alone."

Then take it to that thread and leave it out of this one.

Posted 106 days ago.

Tiredofit

If he had titled the thread I BELIEVE IN GLOBAL WARMING DO YOU I would agree with your view on the matter, but when you intentionally try to represent anyone who has doubt about the science as deniers and anti science, you are a hypocrite and a fraud.

Posted 106 days ago.

Tiredofit

Harry my be dishonest and a fraud but I don't think he is stupid. He chose words like Anti Science and Denier as pejoratives and now he has to live with it when I bring up his anti science denier views.

Posted 106 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or