Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
9 hours ago.
by mythravere
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Thatsabsurd

"Only a fool would latch onto what NOAA is saying"

Myth you still are an imbecile..........NOAA is the provider of the models that your "Climate Scientists" get so much of their data from. (Albeit "deliberately" altered data)

thank you for pointing that out to us you hypocrite.

Go fold your tin-foil hat---- your type are no longer having any effect on those cable of real science................

Posted 77 days ago.

mythravere

Also the weather underground website is listing the proper temps for Parkersburg right now.

What would be the point for NOAA to alter temp data when there are all these other sources of temp data that would conflict with what they say?

Posted 77 days ago.

mythravere

And lets talk of this "conspiracy" by climate scientists.

Have any of you denying dillweeds ever thought that Heh maybe what I think isn't too plausible because you know what.

Everything the scientists are saying is auditable. It can be scrutinized by outside parties if need be.

Maybe that needs to done to make you numbskulls shutup?

Pray tell an oil company would have enough money to make that happen wouldn't they? Wonder why they haven't done that?

Posted 77 days ago.

mythravere

"So if climatology is exaggerating for what if not money?"

What if and I do mean what if the powers that be knew the end date for when fossil fuels ran out? And it was in the maybe not near future but somewhat close future like 20 years.

If they are lying about it that'd be the only reason. Because to announce something like that would cause the world to tear itself apart. Can you imagine how many countries would take off on a warpath to secure energy supplies?

Trying to get people to make the switch to renewables willingly would be a better way.

Posted 77 days ago.

mythravere

Did you ever think that there could possibly be something wrong with the website. Because in the past I have seen the same exact thing happen for a short while.

Every single time the temperature was 104.

Technical issue anyone?

Posted 77 days ago.

mythravere

" In six months some of the same idiots posting on here that regurgitate the lie of GW will refer back to this date and temp as their evidence that the world is getting hotter."

Um no you freaking idiot. God how stupid are you.

It was actually nice when you stopped posting on here.

Posted 77 days ago.

mythravere

Only an absolute fool would "read" into what the NOAA website is saying right now.

And sure enough we got the fool thatsabsurd latching onto it!

Posted 77 days ago.

Thatsabsurd

*******forecast.weather.gov

Posted 77 days ago.

Thatsabsurd

Current Conditions

Fair

104°F

40°C

Humidity19% Wind SpeedNA BarometerNA Dewpoint54°F (12°C) Visibility10.00 mi Heat Index102°F (39°C)

Last Update on 29 Jan 2:53 pm EST

Current conditions at

Parkersburg, Mid Ohio Valley Regional Airport (KPKB)

Lat: 39.36°N Lon: 81.43°W Elev: 831ft.

More Local Wx | 3 Day History | Mobile Weather 3 Miles SW Parkersburg WV

Posted 77 days ago.

Thatsabsurd

LOL Noaa has been deliberately altering the temperature recordings of the last few weeks(just like they did the great lakes temps of over 400) They have Parkersburg, WV listed at 104f today. In six months some of the same idiots posting on here that regurgitate the lie of GW will refer back to this date and temp as their evidence that the world is getting hotter.

The only thing is they will believe without a doubt it was true. So get used to it people todays temperature in Parkersburg is 104f.

Posted 77 days ago.

Tiredofit

Did you spot the exaggerations in the ipcc report?

Posted 77 days ago.

harryanderson

And I've seen anything called "how to talk to a denier."

I can spot exaggerations and falsehoods without such help.

Posted 77 days ago.

harryanderson

I don't go to websites such as the one you describe. Sounds to political for me.

Posted 77 days ago.

Tiredofit

Ahh harry you are just not that clever, looking at enviromarxists website about "how to talk to a denier". It gives a series of questions and provides talking points. Lol it's just what you are trying to use right down to your tobacco references. Lol. Oh harry.

Posted 77 days ago.

Tiredofit

She also didn't say it was u acceptable, so she tacitly endorsed it by doing nothing about it. She freely admired it was to garner funding. The president said unequivocaly climate change is real. So no there is no uncertainty as far as he is concerned. The emails DO show collusion and fraud despite what sham investigation said. So if climatology is exaggerating for what if not money?

Posted 77 days ago.

harryanderson

Here’s an example of unexaggerated, concrete language:

195 out of the 200 climate scientists who have most published peer-reviewed papers and been most cited in other papers believe mankind’s activities have contributed to global warming.

Posted 77 days ago.

Thatsabsurd

PEER REVIEW LOL LOL LOL the only ones they can get to agree are their peers.....anyone else who ever vetted it from the science world called it hogwash from the beginning.

So lets look ate the credentials of their peers............

Accountants without any jobs kills......self-proclaim to be "Climate Scientists) Literature degrees unable to find employment become staff to the "self-proclaimed' climate science world, expounding on their world of 'make-believe"

and then you have the imbecile loyal followers wearing their Tin-foil hats salivating over their every word.........

Some of which you can find on this very forum.

Posted 77 days ago.

harryanderson

“And just how do you propose to do that”

First, let’s stop exaggerating. Let’s look at some of the exaggerations you have made just this morning.

“It's clearly accepted as she said to gain funding.” You exaggerated. She didn’t say it was “accepted.” She said it was done.

“According to you and your president there is no uncertainty.” I’ve already dealt with this falsehood.

“those that are on the gravy train” You exaggerated. Climate scientists aren’t getting rich.

“Emails clearly show deception and secrecy.” You exaggerated, according to multiple independent investigations.

So, as a first step, I propose we stop using sensational exaggerated language such as “accepted,” “ no uncertainty,” “gravy train,” and “clearly.”

So will you agree to stop exaggerating?

Posted 77 days ago.

Tiredofit

There is too much money at stake for those involved.

Posted 77 days ago.

Tiredofit

The problem with you Harry is you BELIEVE that all this "research" is done with the intent to remove doubt. The fact is, exaggerations are an acceptable ploy to get attention and funding. Emails clearly show deception and secrecy. You will never get those that are on the gravy train to junmp off.

Posted 77 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or