| Latest Post: Started By: Rank: Category There is no movement in the United States to kill people in the name of second amendment rights but there is a movement that has murdered 1,200,000 children in the name of women's rightsThe silver tongued talking heads on the magic living room box would have us believe that the country is in an uproar over the alleged murders of 26 people at an elementary school in Newtown, CT. An investigation is still pending. But the allegations are flying. Generally speaking, the anti-constitutionalists who don't own guns, have never fired guns and certainly have limited ability to identify them, would be willing to take away one of our most important constitutional right because they believe it would make them more "safe". None of the gun violence in America has been committed in the name of gun rights. Also, keep in mind, these anti-constitutionalists generally are of the same demographic that also believes that murdering 1,200,000 American children in 2012 in the name of women's rights is acceptable. Member CommentsTiredofitMan thrves in warming cycles and suffers in cold cycles, that is a fact. We should embrace a warming trend. Posted 70 days ago. TiredofitSO MYTH by your own words, its possible for the climate to vary based on NATURAL causes and NOT CARBON. Yet you still persist on the notion that we are causing this warming (however mild) trend. How can you justify this Posted 70 days ago. TiredofitWell now MYTH why do you think the causes are different NOW???????????????? Posted 70 days ago. mythravereNow as for the Ice Ages. There are various theories as to why we came out of them. Some involve a change in oceanic currents due to a warming Antarctic. Earths wobble may have had a hand in it. Changes in the earths albedo. There is a lot to read when it comes to ice ages. Both their causes and dissipations. Look it up for yourself. Its pretty interesting. Posted 70 days ago. harryanderson"Harry, I am not talking to or about you." I'm cool with that. Nevertheless, I will continue to post corrections when others post misrepresentations, especially misrepresentations about God. And I decline your invitation to go elsewhere. Posted 70 days ago. TiredofitNo one is talking to you NANCYBOY but thats just like you to try to talk when the adults are talking. MAKE IT HAPPEN like ya said. IM WAITING. Posted 70 days ago. TiredofitStill waiting NANCYBOY yet you show what a coward you really are. Posted 70 days ago. TiredofitYou have yet to comment on the ICE AGE You say our GOVT doesnt work yet you support surrendering your liberties to them as well as you money. HOW ODD. Posted 70 days ago. mythravereGovernment wouldn't be a problem if we had one that worked. Nothing works when everyone is divided. Al Gore I could give two sharts about. My belief in mans impact on the climate isn't based on him. I follow what the scientists are saying. I look at deviations in seasonal weather patterns. Above all I try to understand the science of why it is happening. Take for example that in earths history some of the hottest periods took place when the carbon content of the atmosphere was way higher than it is today. Then I take into account where that carbon went back then. When mass extinctions took place how much carbon was pulled out of this planets carbon cycle? Where did that carbon go? Well we know where some of it went. We use if for energy. And by using it we are returning it back to the atmosphere. Posted 70 days ago. Tiredofitoh BTW I am going to sell my failing network to Al jezerah and the oil interests I railed about for decades. Look the other way now. Posted 70 days ago. TiredofitLook at AL GORE. I want to hear your thoughts on HIM. He was little more than a snake oil salesman. Yet you still buy that snake oil. GIVE ME YOUR FREEDOM and YOUR MONEY I will save you. Posted 70 days ago. TiredofitYou seem to have a healthy skepticism of GOVT yet you buy into this supposes global warming nonesense. I tell ya I just dont undersatnd it. DO tell me about the ice age. I do want to hear your take on how we left that era. Posted 70 days ago. mythravereWhen it comes to making decisions on courses of action I look at the facts and make the best possible choice. Politicians do not do that. They dont do that because we the people dont force them to do that. We dont do that right there because we have allowed ourselves to become polarized. Divide and conquer! Posted 70 days ago. TiredofitAgain MYTH, where does GOVT come into play. I agree that we must manage our resources and our land. What I am trying to get you to understand, is that politicians will convince the stupid that they are the answer to an imagined crisis and ONLY thier freedoms and wealth will fix this crisis. Posted 70 days ago. mythravereI do weigh things on merit. If someone tells me we are destroying this earth I say NO WE ARE NOT. But we are messing with the natural order of life in pretty significant ways. Take for example the testosterone level of men today. Its about 20% less than two decades ago. Why is that? My guess chemicals in the food we eat and the water along with the everyday objects we come into contact with. We cant literally destroy the earth unless we build a massive bomb. But we can mess up the environment and the chemistry that makes life possible and degrade the ability of life to sustain itself on this planet. We can deplete our natural resources. We can be stupid and not come up with plans of action in the event of food supply disruptions. Although some will survive undoubtedly. Posted 70 days ago. TiredofitHarry, I am not talking to or about you. Take your fraudulent self elswhere. I have little regard for you. Posted 70 days ago. harryandersonThat is, if you FEEL those words represent fraudulent thinking, I suggest you take it up with their author. Posted 70 days ago. Post a Comment |