Okay, gun fetish folks, tell those 20 dead elementary school children at Sandy Hook School in Newtown, CT. why you think everyone should be packing firearms!

How many armed employees does DHS have? How much gun range time do they need to ensure their proficiency?

I imagine that takes a lot of rounds.

Can't you read McScott, I agree the SSA purchase appears to be legitimate although I have no idea why the need so many armed perronnel. Is there really that big of a threat facing social security employees?

My question to you is, why is DHS buying so much ammo? Who are they going to war with?

ht tp://www .ssa. gov/org/

just because you got caught being the trifecta, no reason for you to be a total douche.

Show where there are 66000 "armed" SSA employees. citation needed.

They have 66000 employees, not "armed employees" as they are not.

Now thatI've answered why SSA purchased ammo Barney McDcott, care to address why DHS needs to fight the Iraq war for 24 years. That's a lot of training, don't you think.

SSA has 66000 armed members skippy. The reason given for the ammo purchase is 174000 rounds meaning they get 2.63 rounds apiece. So they get 1.63 more rounds than Barney McScott. That seems about right given the quality of most government employees, don't you agree McScott.

"You do realize that training and live fire takes a lot of ammunition right?

You do also realize that training with your carry ammunition is the best way?

How many 357 sig rounds are you or any one else you know shooting?"

you can circle jerk all you want, there. Both the DHS and SSA are in that link to snopes.

also I answered as to "why" they'd need ammo.

again it shows you really don't know anything about training in firearms.

you have asked and been answered. again

I'm surprised you haven't found why SS needs even 170+k rounds. It was so easy.

And where did I say anything about a conspircy scooter. I ask why the agencies need the bulk purchases.

So why do they?

I was wrong on the 21 million number. It should have been 2.1 million. Now focus scooter. Why would the SSA need that many rounds?

Answer that and then we'll deal with DHS. Which was not addressed in the link as you (lie) claim. I know you can't handle too much at one time.

"you do understand that both have armed members. It says as much in the link, wouldn't 176.000 be a lot less than your 21 million rounds? "

Pretty certain I did. I can only assume you've never done any firearm training?

I'm not a tea party republican so I just don't see your conspiracy as anything but that, a conspiracy that's been debunked... You still a birther too?

Sorry Skippy, I guess my . wasn't placed. It should have been 2.1 million. Even at that, you've not answered why the social security administration needs ammo.

Don't you know scooter? I do. Want me to tell you?

BTW

2,112,000 is NOT 21 million rounds.. What in the world is wrong with you?

gllllavin !&!

DHS was covered by the snopes link as well.

You do realize that training and live fire takes a lot of ammunition right?

You do also realize that training with your carry ammunition is the best way?

How many 357 sig rounds are you or any one else you know shooting?

hoarding and greed are why ammunition is scarce, not these nutty conspiracies tired/ithink/arron. WND and the blaze are NOT reliable sources.(which by the way popped right to the top of the search on your 21 million number)

12*174,000 equals what Skippy. The article I wrote stated that was the purchase but there seems to be some confusion. Seems the request for quote was amended AFTER the blog was posted from monthly to a 1 time purchase.

Even at that, why does SSA need to purchase 174,000 rounds?

And I can't help but not Scooter that you failed to address the purchase by DHS.

Why?

Don't you know?

Come on Scooter, you can do better than that.

you do understand that both have armed members. It says as much in the link, wouldn't 176.000 be a lot less than your 21 million rounds?

Nice scare tactic, but just not true. THAT'S why I posted the link.

Nice of you to quote the "claim", but not the debunking.

From your site Skippy...

“Claim: The Social Security Administration (SSA) and The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) are buying arms as preparation for civil unrest.”

I’m curious Skippy, why did you post a link debunking a claim no one has made. The question I put forth that you seemed unable (surprise) to comprehend was why are DHS and SSA buying ammunition?

From your link…

“Mixture”

“True: THE SSA issued a Request for quote for 174,000 rounds of hollow point bullets.”

Why does the SSA need ammunition Scooter? You go an answer for that?

“Partially True:” “The DHS issued requests for quotes for hundreds of millions of rounds of ammunition.”

Why does Homeland Security need enough ammunition to fight the Iraq War for 24 years Scooter? You got answers or are you going to post a link to another claim no one is making?

DA

ht tp://www .snopes. com/politics/guns/ssabullets.asp

DHS has enough bullets to fight the Iraq War for almost 30 years which is a ton given our troops fired ~70 million rounds a year. Reckon there's a reason they need that many bullets?

I wonder if the reasons as good as the one the Social Security Administration has for a recent 21 million round purchase?