Who Lied About the Attack on 9/11/12?

This makes no sense, even for Bachmann. Why would the White House want to trade a 70 percent bogus scandal for a 70 percent real one? And if they did want to distract from Benghazi, there has to be a better way than manufacturing negative information about yourself. This is a bit like a child intentionally peeing himself to “distract” his classmates from the fact that his pants just fell down.

Looooooooooooool!!!!!!!!!!!!!

“I was in that Benghazi hearing,” she told WND. “I think the Obama administration is desperate to spin Benghazi, and they can’t. I think they saved this story up for a day like today so that conservatives would focus on this admission.”

They seem to have gotten so good at scandal alchemy that they don’t know what to do when someone hands them solid gold. When handed a real conspiracy, they instead are building a new conspiracy on top of it that dismissies the old one.

Lol!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

For some of Obama’s biggest and most imaginative critics, the abundance of scandal stinks to high heaven and suggests the White House is intentionally downing itself in controversy — for some reason. Jon Stewart predicted the IRS scandal would confirm every anti-Obama conspiracy theory out there, but instead, Michele Bachmann, Rush Limbaugh, and Alex Jones smell a rat about the scandals, themselves (call it a meta-conspiracy). Continued next post

So no proof. of course.

the trifecta is failing.

Mission accomplished eh?

Disprove it Betsy.

If you can.

And what exactly is not true Mod

typical tired/ithink/aaron cop out.

you can't prove it or you would have.

lying conservatives, color me shocked

"So on one hand they are/might be overstepping their bounds and on another they aint doing their job."

I still don’t see information about churches and religious groups violating tax exempt status but for the sake of conversation, let’s suppose they are. Hypothetically speaking, if churches and religious organizations are acting in a manner that violates their tax exempt status and the IRS were to remove that status, should then money donated to the organization become tax deductible?

What I saw was a claim by one liberal stating he was targeted for his political beliefs. Sorry dude but that proves nothing.

As for revenues, I’ll try to dumb this down so that even you can understand it. There is no story to cite stating that our revenue increased 50% because I did not find that information in a story. Unlike you, I do not need talking points handed to me with my opinion attached because without direction I’m lost. I find information an form my own opinion. I know that is a foreign concept to you but it’s called intelligence.

I know revenue increased 50%, from about $1.85 trillion in 2001 to $2.8 trillion on 2013 because I found the information on my own. It’s out there, go look and stop crying about proof. At this point, you have 3 choices. You can either accept the truth and move on, you can try and prove it wrong or you can continue crying about proof and confirm just how unintelligent you truly are.

Anything else?

not so, tiredofit.

Myth you know*******well that MISSION ACCOMPLISHED refered to the naval task force. Military units complete MISSIONS during a war lots of them. Its disingenuous for you to toss that out like Bush hung that banner up to say the war was over. A lefty talking point as well as a lie.

So on one hand they are/might be overstepping their bounds and on another they aint doing their job.

Only in America.

Heres the kicker. The IRS isn't touching the church issue. At least like it should.

So, proven, now let's see your revenue increases of 50%.

As you said... Prove it.

2004, Bush administration and the IRS "thugging" their way into persecuting churches. I bet you popped a chubby for it.

ht tp://www .washingtonpost. com/wp-dyn/articles/A10600-2004Oct29.html

you first. 50% show it.

I seem to recall the republicans going after a few democratic leaning churches not too many years ago.

Prove it

I'm all for taxing the churches preaching politics from the pulpit.

I seem to recall the republicans going after a few democratic leaning churches not too many years ago.

So why ain't Holder going after the churches? You reckon hes too busy looking at tax returns and phone records?