Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
54 days ago.
by RANDOM21
Ithink
#1

Who Lied About the Attack on 9/11/12?

It is incredible that democrats keep blathering about Romney lying, when we have the shock and disgust of seeing the president and his administration lying to us about the security of Americans. Unbelievable .

 
 

Member Comments

moderation

. What does the gun debate have to do with the lost lives associated with the Benghazi issue,tiredofit ? Perhaps it is a matter of dementia, and not your iq that is responsible for that post.

Posted 351 days ago.

Bush had been in office 7 months on 911. It took forever to get his administration officials confirmed, because the dems were still hung up on hanging chads.

The terrorists had learned to fly right under Clinton's nose. There had already been several terrorist attacks and Clinton treated them like domestic crimes, just like obama.

Clinton's nose. Remember th Trade CEnter

Posted 351 days ago.

Pay attention to the testimony tomorrow. It will be quite different from the regurgitated garbage you will hear on MSNBC.

Posted 351 days ago.

Tiredofit

Ill say it again myth you are reverting back to your former self. Stop lumping everyone into a pocketyou feel free to attack

Posted 351 days ago.

moderation

No. If it is proved barry lied, he should be held accountable.

Posted 351 days ago.

mythravere

No it's all about a crusade of foolishness that's been waged since 2000. Obama just made right flip their lids even more.

Posted 351 days ago.

mythravere

Obama is most certainly not excused. But is this investigation about righting a wrong or about destroying Obama politically? It's not about righting a wrong.

You folks got a seething hatred for Obama and the left. You are warriors fighting a war. Lol!

From day one it was deny deny deny everything anything Obama brought to the table. Anything that could be used to shut him down is,has and will be entertained.

Posted 351 days ago.

Tiredofit

Ok I get it, you think Bush dropped the ball and lied to us, so be intellectualy honest and hold Obama accountable if he did. Or is he excused?

Posted 351 days ago.

Tiredofit

Is it possible to discuss this administration without discussing the last? Does criticism of this administration necessarily mean support for the previous one?

Posted 351 days ago.

Tiredofit

Why deflect so much? What does Bush have to do with Bengazi, answer nothing. Attacking a strawman shows a lack of facts or intellectual prowess.

Posted 351 days ago.

moderation

Exploitation, you say? Perhaps the actions of the 'pom pom' boy's administration, after rejecting the alarms of the cia, the nsc, and anti- terrorism chief richard clark and virtually green lighting the 9-11 attacks, would qualify for an example of political exploitation !?

Posted 351 days ago.

Tiredofit

Yea its exploitation at the highest level. Pushing a supposed assault wepons ban when no supposed assault weapon was used, nor would any legislation proposed have stopped that tragic event. That's exploitation.

Posted 351 days ago.

mythravere

Is it exploitation?

Posted 351 days ago.

"Its funny if we look back to the days and years after 9-11. Bush and his administration somehow escaped any punishment being sought for their failures in stopping the 9-11 attacks."

I don’t think not knowing or even dropping the ball carries a big difference than ‘standing down’ as American Special Forces were commanded to do. And while I agree that Republicans are driving the conversation, for me that’s not as much of an issue as the fact that Democrats on the panel are giving the Administration a free pass. If profiting from American deaths is shameful here as you claim Republicans are doing, then ignoring American deaths as Democrats are doing is despicable.

I do find it odd though that you ridicule the right as shameful for “exploiting 3 deaths.” If that’s the case, what is the left for exploiting the 26 Sandy Hook deaths?

Posted 351 days ago.

mythravere

We both know that if a 9-11 style attack happened on his watch and it was found out have been planned during Bushs term. Just for arguments sake. You know for a fact it'll all be about Obama. When it was planned will be a moot point unworthy of consideration by you folks.

Posted 351 days ago.

Myth, you know very well that Bush was not president when all the training and planning took place for 911 . Clinton had that honor. He paid no attention to terror, just like Obama.

American diplomats begging for help, and being told no, is not excusable. This was covered up to get obama re~elected. It worked.

Posted 351 days ago.

Tiredofit

Generalize much?

Posted 351 days ago.

Tiredofit

Generalize much?

Posted 351 days ago.

Tiredofit

Myth there you go with the you guys routine. I see you slipping back to that angry insulting tone you had before, shame. Care to tell me what I said about Obama or bush? Care to tell me why the SOS won't be doing some explaining about this?

Posted 351 days ago.

mythravere

I mean care to explain how 3000 deaths on our own soil never resulted in the level of outrage that you guys are leveling toward Obama?

When its your own boy you look the other way. And if I remember correctly. After 9-11. Anyone or any country that wasn't with us was against us. Right? People that questioned Bush had their patriotism questioned also.

Man you guys are a certain kind of special.

Posted 351 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or