Who Lied About the Attack on 9/11/12?

The Tea Party wants government reach rolled back to the extent that what would result would pretty much be anarchy. Or something close to it.

Let me ask those who support the right a simple question.

Say an issue arises,an inquiry is put forth and nothing is found to be wrong.

In the eyes of the right can the group who is the focus of the issue ever be shown to be innocent?

Or are supporters of the right of the guilty with never a chance for innocence mentality?

When did the TEA party say they hate Govt exactly, or is this something you made up? The TEA party resists unconstitutional overreach by the Federal Government, but are far from anarchists.

No but the should be scrutinized to make sure they are conducting their business according to the law.

After all the Tea Party isn't too far off from acting like the Sovereigns do. So who is to say that some Tea Party groups haven't crossed that line.

I dont know that they haven't. Do you?

If the IRS did something illegal then those responsible should be punished.

Like I said before you dont me. So laugh all you want.

But just to make you feel better. The left often times heck most of the time delivers the message wrapped up in the cloth of victimhood.

It is EXACTLY about pandering and free stuff. Always had been always will. Are you suggesting that because TEA party types believe taxes are too high, they deserve to have the IRS target them for intimidation???

“And as far as the IRS issue goes. Well when the group you call home takes massive issues with taxes,the IRS and government in general is it too much to figure that some heat might be coming your way?”

Doesn’t matter if you figure it or not, it’s illegal. If you read Nixon’s Articles of Impeachment, his use of the IRS was one of his downfalls. On this one, the Obama apologist want to blame an underling who was appointed by Bush but that’s a load as a detailed investigation prove given that preliminary questions have already proven that senior IRS officials were aware of what was taking place. Is it a stretch to connect it to Administration officials? Time will tell.

“Take Republicans for example. Gots some good ideas when it comes to lots of issues. Just so happens they have a nasty tendency to deliver the message like an a55hole.”

That from a centralist with no deep seated hatred or anger.

Yeah, right. BAAAAHAAAAAAHAAAAA

And as far as the IRS issue goes. Well when the group you call home takes massive issues with taxes,the IRS and government in general is it too much to figure that some heat might be coming your way?

If you hate taxes the IRS and the government its not too much of a stretch that some of those people might stop supporting what they hate by not paying taxes anymore.

Its not about pandering and free stuff. Its about doing the job and taking care of this country. Which in turn takes care of the people.

Solutions to our issues are right out there for the taking. The problem it seems is that no one knows how to bring those solutions to the people.

Take Republicans for example. Gots some good ideas when it comes to lots of issues. Just so happens they have a nasty tendency to deliver the message like an a55hole.

If you required people to be popular to maintain their seat and or pay, you end up right where we are, pandering and free stuff. Not a great idea. We already have that system at the ballot box.

Myth you realize Lincoln wouldn't have survived your system.

Does any of them include any sort of punishment for lying to the American Public, cover-ups or using the IRS for going after the opposition?

Take the money out of it. Do a top to bottom rebuild of the electoral process. Ban or heavily restrict lobbying.

Tie congressional and presidential pay to their approval rating. Approval rating drops to a certain point? Automatically their out. Or at least an inquiry into their performance is put into play.

I got lots of ideas.

Is there really an Independent candidate not tied to any particular group or idology. Given the amount of money needed to launch such a candiancy, we would get either an uba-liberal like Bloomberg, who is currently assaulting the Constitution or a stringent Conservative like Steve Forbes.

"even though revenues have increased 50% since 2001"

citation needed.

I for one thing believe we are Taxed Enough Already. I'm also smart enough to know that even though revenues have increased 50% since 2001, spending has doubled over that same time period and that's our problem. Nobody needs to pay more, the idiots in Washington need to spend less.

I think we all can mostly agree that asides from a few ideological differences both parties are not all that different. Government money is spent differently but its still wasted some way or another.

I'd love to see an independent president who was tied to any one group.

But that aint going to happen when most people pick a side and then dig in.

I had hopes for the Tea Party but it got ruined by Karl Rove. Maybe just maybe it can become at some point the party for the people who dislike the other two.

There is not pattern of corruption coming out.

No its bubbling up as it does with every single new administration regardless of party affiliation.

It would also seem that bush appointee does not like tea party politics.

Ok, I admit, I could be wrong. It may not be corruption. It could hysterical as easily be incompetence.