Who Lied About the Attack on 9/11/12?

those numbers were pulled out of your arse.

ht tp://www .newsandsentinel. com/page/mboard.detail/fNav/785/Who-Lied-About-the-Attack-on-9-11-12-.html

what's the problem posting a link or any other citation to your numbers aaron/ithink/tired? it's real easy to post em

care to offer a link....."

I see the problem now.

No reading comprehension.

"All special characters, including HTML, will be removed."

speaking of facts, care to offer a link or any other thing to back up your claim tired/ithink/aaron?

"even though revenues have increased 50% since 2001"

citation needed.

What's not factual mod?

"So we can add necrophillia to your list of issues Myth. I'm pretty sure that ones illegal. You really should be careful in what you admit to in an open forum."

Hey it was a 50/50 chance your parent/s have passed away.

No real disrespect was intended. But if you want to get nasty then I am fully prepared to make the paint peel off the walls so to speak.

I won't go there if you won't go there. The moment you step across that line then I'm coming across with you.

Time will tell, but ain't the gossip fence a wonderful thing?!

Just the facts,aarons, just the facts! (~;

Progressive groups should be scrutinized the same as conservative groups.

Maybe more so. Because one reason I never voted for Obama is that his rise to prominence was rather strange.

He went from being a nobody to somebody really fast. That took a lot of help.

"Why do I need a farm animal your mom squeals like a pig pretty dang well and your daddy catches the drippings."

So we can add necrophillia to your list of issues Myth. I'm pretty sure that ones illegal. You really should be careful in what you admit to in an open forum.

And what happens when you take the government out of the loop? People and businesses do what they want.

Regulation of business didn't happen because the corporate world did what was right. It happened because they did what was wrong or didn't care about the consequences of how they did business.

If its a 501 (c) target then why did no progressive groups undergo scrutiny? After all, money raised by those groups are as substantial as money raised by Conservative groups!

Its not the low taxes and constitutional government that's the problem. Thats needed. Its the potential for deregulation that might and I said might that possibly could cause problems.

Thats one part of the rightwing causes. To take regulations off businesses. Which wouldn't be bad but you cant trust all business.

Do elaborate on how lower taxes and constitutional govt leads to anarchy, can't wait to hear this one

Myth you know nothing about the TEA party and are talking out your arse.

So just to be clear. Do you have a problem with singling out the TEA party by the IRS?

They shouldn't be singled out but be part of a thorough system that keeps all political groups in line.

Why do I need a farm animal your mom squeals like a pig pretty dang well and your daddy catches the drippings.

It is the 501c exemption that was the focus. You know,was political money being raised under false pretenses. That of course, is a separate issue from the zeal of irs employees as they approached this issue.

So just to be clear. Do you have a problem with singling out the TEA party by the IRS?

You post consistently on message board.

There fixed that for you. This is the only one post on.